Whose investigation is it anyway??
WHOSE INVESTIGATION IS IT ANYWAY?
If we can’t have some competence in city government, can we at least have some consistency, commitment and truth? This “investigation” or “personnel audit” into the Police Chief has taken on many names depending on whether their investigator needed a license or not but it has now morphed into different forms and numbers as well.
What started out as a single investigation conducted by Bauer’s handpicked hired gun Reiter assisted by local attorney Cal Stacey has apparently become two separate investigations with two separate reports.
The first contract called for the report to be given to Bauer. Then, under pressure, the Council issued a second contract and said they were going to get the report and take over ownership. Now the mayor is quoted as saying Bauer has the report which he will summarize for the Council’s benefit. Huh? Which is it? Is it too much to ask the Council to pick a story and stick to it?
posted by merryann @ 12:55 PM
1 comments
1 Comments:
I just find it totally unbelievable that Bauer and the mayor would completely turn this thing upside down. It is now obvious that Bauer realizes Reiter should have had a license and this is Bauer's attempt to work his way around it. Bauer says the license is Reiter's problem while the Mayor is pushing for the state to resolve the issue. (Ying and Yang) The Mayor and Bauer are in a reacting mode and that is why the story always changes. I use the Mayor instead of the Council because he always appears to write the letters first without Council input (probably has Bauer's though). He also is the one calling the shots on the executive meetings. If Bauer can't evaluate Tussing's performance, how can he be expected to evaluate the other department heads?
Post a Comment
<< Home